Home » The phone is one of general practice’s most important clinical channels. Are we training for it?

The phone is one of general practice’s most important clinical channels. Are we training for it?

by Tracy Williams

Walk into any GP practice and the phone remains one of its most important clinical and access channels. Patients call to describe symptoms and seek appointments or advice. Reception and care-navigation teams gather information and help route patients appropriately. GPs consult, assess and make decisions without necessarily seeing the person on the other end of the line.

Telephone triage and consultation are now established parts of general practice. Yet the way we develop and support the people doing that work has not always kept pace. The phone can still be treated primarily as a utility rather than as an environment in which staff need appropriate training, supervision and support.

That gap matters. A phone consultation carries different challenges from a face-to-face appointment. There is no visual information. Tone, language and hesitation take on greater importance. A trainee GP learning to consult by phone is developing a distinct skill, and reviewing real consultations with an experienced supervisor can provide valuable learning.

The same applies to reception and care-navigation teams. How information is gathered and a patient is routed can affect access, safety and patient experience. Staff need appropriate training and support to handle those conversations consistently and confidently.

What good looks like: Denny Cross Medical Centre

Denny Cross Medical Centre, a GP training practice in NHS Forth Valley, provides an example of what can happen when recorded calls are used as a teaching tool rather than simply stored as background data.

The practice has incorporated call recording into clinical supervision. Trainees and mentors can review consultations together, while difficult calls can become useful learning material. Recordings can also provide an accurate account when complaints or disputed conversations need to be reviewed.

Liz McQuillan, Practice Manager at Denny Cross, has also highlighted the potential value of being able to search recordings by subject or call type. Instead of working through recordings individually to find a useful example, searchable call data could help trainers identify relevant conversations more efficiently.

That matters because traditional call review can be time-consuming. When useful calls are difficult to identify, even teams with good intentions may struggle to make review and coaching a routine part of development.

Moving from random review to targeted coaching

This is the area Think Healthcare is developing within Ascend.

AI-supported transcription and analytics have the potential to make recorded conversations searchable, allowing authorised users to identify relevant calls without manually listening through large volumes of audio. A trainer looking for a particular type of consultation could find appropriate examples more efficiently.

Sentiment analysis can potentially add another layer by identifying indicators of emotional tone within conversations. Rather than relying entirely on random sampling, this could help teams identify calls that may warrant closer human review, including conversations where a patient appears frustrated or distressed.

Evaluation tools can also provide greater structure. A practice can define the elements it expects within particular types of calls — such as questions, information, checks or closing steps — and use those criteria to support more consistent review and coaching.

These tools should support rather than replace professional judgement. AI-generated transcripts, sentiment indicators and evaluations can be imperfect and require appropriate human oversight. Their value is in reducing some of the friction involved in finding and reviewing relevant calls, while leaving training and clinical decisions with appropriately qualified people.

The use of recorded patient conversations and AI analysis also requires appropriate information governance. Practices need to consider data-protection requirements, transparency with patients and staff, access controls, retention and relevant NHS clinical-safety and governance requirements when deploying these technologies.

Why this is a quality issue, not just a tech upgrade

The value of a call-data platform is not simply that conversations can be recorded. Call recording has existed for years. The opportunity lies in making authorised recordings easier to find, understand and use appropriately.

When a practice can identify relevant calls efficiently and review them against clear standards, communication can become something teams examine and improve systematically. That applies both to a GP trainee developing telephone-consultation skills and to a care navigator learning how to handle challenging conversations.

Denny Cross demonstrates how recorded calls can become useful training material within a GP practice. As more sophisticated analysis tools develop, practices may have greater opportunities to move from occasional call sampling towards more targeted, evidence-informed coaching.

The phone remains a major part of how patients interact with general practice. Training, supervision and technology need to reflect that reality.

Talk to us about your own calls

If telephone communication is central to how your practice delivers care, it is worth understanding what is happening on those calls.

Think Healthcare works with NHS practices to use telephony and call data to support training, communication and a clearer understanding of patient experience.

To discuss how this approach could work for your practice or PCN, contact the team at Think Healthcare.

You may also like

Assistive Tech News